Wednesday, September 22, 2010

The role of portraits in the earlr days of photography and portraits today.


A portraiture is a composed image of a person or group in a still position. The difference of the early years of portraits and today is straight forward, technology. In the early days, portraits were made exclusive, were limited and time exhausting. They were exclusive because of the cost for a single portrait. They were limited in what they could do, which was indoors only, black and white and depending on the lighting resulted in the tints and shades that would be seen. The entire process was time exhausting and making a simple mistake or taking too long could mean doing the entire session all over again.

Now a day, technology has changed and it can take a half an hour to capture 150 frames. The methods of getting that perfect portrait are much easier, and it starts with editing. Software’s like Photoshop® can make editing easier, eliminate the red eyes, reduce blemishes, softening the entire photograph, it can change everything and anything about that portrait. Technology has also allowed it to become easier to duplicate more than one of that single portrait for commercial wise, fine art or even just enough for every family member to have.

In the early days, photographers were almost like scientist. One person couldn’t mandate the entire process; it was usually a team of well skilled people, to help capture a single photograph. Only a few could call themselves photographers in the early days, because of this. The subjects were usually very wealthy and/or prestige people to the society. They were normally industrialists, lawyers, doctors, merchants and politicians. Although photographed portraits were cheaper and more accessible than painted portraits it still was too much for the middle class, ranging from $0.25 to $2.50 a portrait.

In today's society anyone can be a photographer and the subject. Portraits are now taken commemorating a special occasion such as a wedding, graduation and a baby.  The price ranges by the sizes, amount and style that's being done. Now a day, anyone can be a "photographer" with a click of a button. Workers at franchised stores who take portraits are only taught how to take the photographs and the whole developing process are done else where in a factory and are sent back to the store, when ready. The entire complication and un-easy access to gain the equipment is no longer there, making it easy for anyone to claim to be a photographer.

The impact of portraits in the early days, showed a type of status and significance to ones family and community. When that person would die they would pass that portrait down to other generations symbolizing that persons importance to the family.  “By having one's portrait done an individual of the ascending classes could visually affirm his new social status both to himself and to the world at large. To meet the increased demand for portraits, the art became more and more mechanized. The photographic portrait was the final stage in this trend toward mechanization” (Precursors of the Photographic Portrait)

The impact of technology on portraits has changed a lot since the early days. It is much easier now to capture the photo and develop it. The camera it self has become digitalized, with a click of a button you capture the composition and have access to view it on the back of the camera, then have the software to edit the picture and have the proper printing paper and ink to develop it. Technology it's self has simplified everything, impacting all generations to come. 

Sources:

Precursors of the Photographic Portrait
A History Of Photography by Lemagny Rouille 36-44

WELCOME!!

Welcome my Barbies and Ken dolls,
This is my fun site, where together we will explore the truth of photography. My taste is more contemporary art, however art in general always grasped me. I am more of a reserved person not because I am shy or timid but, because I am an analysis and thinker. I like to take in people, situations or/and even the enviornment before I react.

I love photography because it is a universal tool, something that everyone has in common but the meaning why varies. Photography keeps life in something that is no longer there, expresses things with out words and touches everyone in different ways. It just relates to me, 'somethings are just better unsaid'.


I am at peace after the storm.
--Why not understand and apprciate something that I constently use and take for granted.